ESC
Clarivate

 
Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from ClarivateTM 2022

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2022) 1.7
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2022) 0.42
Received: 2019-11-25  |  Accepted: 2020-03-18  |  Published: 2020-06-30

Title

Income distribution peculiarities of households with children: a case study


Abstract

The article explores family income indicators in the context of the transformation of the family model in Kazakhstan in terms of large families- households with children. The purpose of the article is to assess the level and dynamics of families´ incomes with children in Kazakhstan to develop recommendations for improving the support policy, that will provide new consumption patterns and sustainable growth of entrepreneurship activities, including social entrepreneurship.The methodology for studying the income level of families with children was based on economic and statistical methods for assessing the inequality of incomes of families with children based on a comparison of the characteristics of the distribution series and quintile groups. An income structure assessment within population is presented in the quintile groups, and the dynamics of the proportion of children in the first quintile group. The authors substantiated the use of the children´share indicator of child poverty in the absence of a corresponding indicator in official statistics in the first quintile group. An analysis of favorable dynamics related to number of children living in low-income families within the first quintile group makes possible to assess current trend as negative. An assessment is made of the differentiation of income within a group of households (HH) with children: the parameters of the distribution series by the indicator of income used for consumption are compared; the ratio of income used for consumption with a living wage is estimated as well. There is estimated uniformity and asymmetry of the distribution series of families with children. To identify common and special characteristics, the distribution series were compared with the similar characteristics of the distribution series for all households. The most significant substantive result identified by the authors is the growing inequality in the distribution of income between small families (1-2 children) and large families (3 or more children) while maintaining a high proportion of children in the first quintile. The authors developed a number of recommendations towards social policy, the introduction of an official indicator of child poverty in official statistics to adequately assess measures taken by the state, and the development of social entrepreneurship as an effective tool to empower children from low-income families.


Keywords

households, children, income, quintile groups, characteristics of a number of distributions, purchasing power of the population, social entrepreneurship


JEL classifications

I38 , J19 , L31


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/562


DOI


Pages

2924-2939


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Pritvorova, Tatyana
Karagandy State University named after E. A. Buketov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan http://ksu.kz
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Temirbyeva, Dinara
Karagandy State University named after E. A. Buketov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan http://ksu.kz
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Petrenko, Yelena
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation http://www.rea.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Benčič, Stanislav
Pan-European University, Bratislava, Slovakia https://www.paneurouni.com
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

7


Number

4


Issue date

June 2020


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 3547  |  PDF downloads: 1198

References


Arriaga, R., Fenson, L., Cronan, T., Pethick, S. 1998. Scores on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory of children from lowand middle-income families. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010043

Search via ReFindit


Becker, G. 1994. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3d ed.). The University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/books/beck94-1

Search via ReFindit


Bekteleeva, D.E. 2012. The impact of the public sector of the Republic of Kazakhstan on household incomes. Bulletin of the Siberian University of Consumer Cooperatives, 1(2), 132-141.

Search via ReFindit


Cahn, N., Carbone, J., DeRose, L., Wilcox, W. 2018. Unequal Family Lives: Causes and Consequences in Europe and the Americas. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235525

Search via ReFindit


Elizarov, V., Zvereva, N. 2018. Household, family and family policy. Demographic and family policy in CIS countries. Dialogue MSU.

Search via ReFindit


Ferguson, H., Bovaird, S., Mueller, M. 2007. The impact of poverty on educational outcomes for children. Paediatr Child Health. 12(8), 701–706. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2528798/

Search via ReFindit


Gribovsky, V. 2019. Family Policy Eurosceptics of Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Europe RAS, 3(90), 54-58.

Search via ReFindit


Guio, A-C., Gordon, D., Marlier, E., Najera, H., Pomati, M. 2018. Towards an EU measure of child deprivation. Child Indicators Research, 11(3), 835-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9491-6

Search via ReFindit


Halpern, R. 2000. Early Intervention for Low-Income Children and Families. Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529320.019

Search via ReFindit


Harding, L.F. 1996. Family, State and Social Policy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-1-349-24377-8%2F1.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Kaydarova, Zh. 2011. Household income with children: positive trends and paradoxes of social transfers. Economics and Statistics, 3, 63-68.

Search via ReFindit


Kolosova, R. 2016. Economic growth and social development: ways to overcome contradictions. The social context of economic development in the 21st century. IMEMO RAS.

Search via ReFindit


Lévesque, M., Minniti, M. 2011. Age matters: how demographics influence aggregate entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.117

Search via ReFindit


Malaeva, M.I. 2009. Living wage in the system of social protection of the population: methodological aspect. Labor and social relations, 8, 29-35.

Search via ReFindit


Nikolskaya, G. 2006. Family in a post-industrial society (for example, the USA). World Economy and International Relations, 50(8), 71-80.

Search via ReFindit


Pivovarova, I., Artyukhov, A. 2011. Russian state family policy. Academic Bulletin, 17 (3), 24-27.

Search via ReFindit


Potapova, O.I. 2016. Problems of implementation of state family policy. Young scientist, 21, 791-793.

Search via ReFindit


Pritvorova T., Bekteleeva D. 2014. Incomes of households with children in Kazakhstan: increasing living standards while maintaining uneven distribution. Economics: Strategy and Practice, 3, 72-93

Search via ReFindit


Ribeiro, R., Fonseca, J. 2018. Spend as I say, not as I do: Children, families and household consumption in different socio-economic contexts. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(5), 566-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12476

Search via ReFindit


Ridge, T. 2007. It's a Family Affair: Low-Income Children's Perspectives on Maternal Work. Journal of Social Policy, 36(3), 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279407001109

Search via ReFindit


Rothman, L. 2007. Oh Canada! Too many children in poverty for too long. Paediatr Child Health. 12(8), 661–665. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2528808/

Search via ReFindit


Sasongko, G., Hunga, I.A.R., Julana, A.S.N. Wahyudi, Y., Paulus Leliak, P., Huruta, A.D. 2019. Public policy for housing development: a case study on housing development in Semarang Regency – Indonesia. Insights into Regional Development, 1(3), 280-300. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.4(1)

Search via ReFindit


Schouten, M.J. 2019. Undoing gender inequalities: insights from the Portuguese perspective. Insights into Regional Development, 1(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.2(1)

Search via ReFindit


Shmoylova R.A., Minashkin V.G., Sadovnikova N.A.et al. 2014. Theory of Statistics Workshop. Tutorial. Finance and statistics.

Search via ReFindit


Sidorov, V. 2015. Family policy in the system of state social policy. Power, 6(11), 83-88.

Search via ReFindit


Sinyavskaya, O. 2011. The main factors of reproduction of human capital. Economic Sociology, 2 (1), 43-87.

Search via ReFindit


Tvaronavičienė, M. 2019. Income distribution peculiarities in differently developed selected European countries versus Qatar. Journal of international Studies, 12(3), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-3/6

Search via ReFindit


Tvaronavičienė, M., Gatautis, R. 2017. Peculiarities of income distribution in selected countries. Economics and Sociology, 10(4), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/9

Search via ReFindit


Tyumentseva, G.I. 2018. State family policy: a regional aspect. Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy, 15(4), 56-72.

Search via ReFindit


Yakovleva A.V., Shamanina A.E., Vasiliev V.G. 2017. Assessment of income and purchasing power of the population in the regions of Russia. Economics and entrepreneurship, 8 (part 3), 360-365.

Search via ReFindit