ESC
Clarivate

 
Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from ClarivateTM 2022

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2022) 1.7
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2022) 0.42
Received: 2019-09-18  |  Accepted: 2019-11-22  |  Published: 2019-12-15

Title

Application of HADI-cycle for providing sustainability of processes of knowledge and innovation


Abstract

The main problems of modern business are related to the processes of creating knowledge and introducing innovations, which form the basis of the "innovation economy". To keep positions in the market, modern enterprises and organizations need continuous creation and production of new products. A constant search for new technologies, methods of personnel management and methods for implementing projects is necessary to ensure sustainable development of the enterprises and business. The article proves a hypothes explaining the process of creating and stimulating innovation within the framework of modern enterprises and organizations and its relationship with the processes of knowledge creation and HADI-cycle. The main scientific research methods are bibliographic analysis, content-analysis, formal logic methods and methods of analogies. The verification with the help of formal logic methods showed the universality of the proposed model for the innovative enterprtnership. The result of this article indicates that the mechanism of interaction between the standard and non-standard cycle of creating new organizational knowledge in the organization management system allows to accelerate the process of creating and introducing innovations, increases the effectiveness of marketing and management in general and sustainability development of the enterprises.


Keywords

sustainability development, innovative entrepreneurship, innovations and technology transfer, stimulating innovation, HADI-cycle, processes of knowledge creation, knowledge conversion


JEL classifications

O33 , O34 , M11 , M13


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/461


DOI


Pages

1628-1640


Funding

This research was supported by the project, which has received funding from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation to Perm National Research Polytechnic University (2017-2019). Grant Agreement Number 26.6884.2017/8.9.

This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Mingaleva, Zhanna A.
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation http://pstu.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Deputatova, Lyudmila N.
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation http://pstu.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Akatov, Nikolay B.
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation http://pstu.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Starkov, Yurii V.
Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russian Federation http://pstu.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Mitrofanova, Elena
State University of Management, Moscow, Russian Federation https://guu.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

7


Number

2


Issue date

December 2019


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 3151  |  PDF downloads: 1753

References


Bigliardi, B., Galati, F. 2014. The Implementation of TQM in R&D Environments. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9, pp. 157-171.

Search via ReFindit


Brem, A., Puente-Diaz, R. and Agogué, M. 2016. Creativity and innovation: State of the art and future perspectives for research. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 1602001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616020011

Search via ReFindit


Bublienė, R., Vinogradova, I., Tvaronavičienė, M., Monni, S. 2019. Legal form determination for the development of clusters‘ activities, Insights into Regional Development, 1(3), pp. 244-258. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.3(5)

Search via ReFindit


Cantwell, J. and Piscitello, L. 2015. New Competence Creation in Multinational Company Subunits: The Role of International Knowledge. World Economics, 38, pp. 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12175

Search via ReFindit


Chang, J.J., Hung, K.P. and Lin, M.J.J. 2014. Knowledge creation and new product performance: the role of creativity R&D. Management, 44, pp. 107-123.

Search via ReFindit


Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Search via ReFindit


Corredoira, R. and Preeta, B. 2015. Measuring Patent’s Influence on Technological Evolution: A Study of Knowledge Spanning and Subsequent Inventive Activity. Research Policy, 44, pp. 508–521.

Search via ReFindit


Dai, M. and Chen, Y. 2016. R&D, Technology Imports and Innovation Capacity—Evidence from High-Tech Industry of China. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 6, pp. 24-32. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2016.61002

Search via ReFindit


Danilina, E.I., Mingaleva, Z.A. and Malikova, Y.I. 2016. Strategic personnel management within innovational development of companies. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics (JARLE-ASERS), 7, pp.1004–1013. .06 https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v7.5(19)

Search via ReFindit


Deming, W.E. 1950. Elementary Principles of the Statistical Control of Quality, JUSE.

Search via ReFindit


Deming, W.E. 1986. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, p. 88.

Search via ReFindit


Felin, T. and Hesterly, W.S. 2007. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32, pp. 195-218.

Search via ReFindit


Fogerberg, J., Fosaas, M. and Soprassart, K. 2012. Exploring the emerging knowledge base of ‘The knowledge society’. Research Policy, 41, pp.1121-1282.

Search via ReFindit


García-Cruz, J., Real, J.C. and Roldán, J.L. 2018. Managerial perceptions of employees’ affective commitment and product innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27, pp. 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1346163

Search via ReFindit


González, X., Miles-Touya, D. and Pazó, C. 2016. R&D, Worker Training and Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence. Industry and Innovation, 23, pp. 694–712.

Search via ReFindit


Grant, R.M. 1996. Grand, toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 93-107.

Search via ReFindit


Griffith, D.A., Noble, S.M. and Chen, Q. 2006. The performance implications of entrepreneurial proclivity: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Retailing, 82, pp.51-62.

Search via ReFindit


Hurley, R.F., Hult, G. and Tomas, M. 1998. Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination, Journal of Marketing, 62, pp. 42-54.

Search via ReFindit


Ishikawa, K. 1985. What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way. Translated by David J. Lu. Englewood Cliffs; NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc, pp. 56-61.

Search via ReFindit


Jian, Z.Q. and Wang, G.F. 2010. A Study of the Relationship among Organizational Learning, Knowledge Creation and New Product Development Performance. Proceeding of the 4 international conference on operation and supply chain management (ICOSCM 2010), 4, pp. 80-84.

Search via ReFindit


Korposh, D., Lee, Y.C., Wei, C.C. and Wei, C.S. 2011. Modeling the Effects of Existing Knowledge on the Creation of New Knowledges. Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, 19 (3), pp. 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X11418134

Search via ReFindit


Krenz, P., Basmer, S., Buxbaum-Conradi, S., Redlich, T. and Wulfsberg, J-P. 2014. Knowledge Management in Value Creation Networks: Establishing a New Business Model through the Role of a Knowledge-Intermediary. Procedia CIRP, 16, pp. 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.006

Search via ReFindit


Leonardi, P.M. and Bailey, D.E. 2008. Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32, pp. 411-436.

Search via ReFindit


Li, Y., Liu, X., Wang, L., Li, M. and Guo, H. 2009. How entrepreneurial effect on knowledge management on innovation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, pp. 645-660.

Search via ReFindit


Li, Y.H., Huang, J.W. and Tsai, M.T. 2009. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, pp. 440-449.

Search via ReFindit


Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess G.G. 2001. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, pp. 429-451. 00048-3 Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, pp. 135-172. Mavrina, I. and Mingaleva A. 2017. Entrepreneurship Education as a factor of regional economic development. In Insights and Potential Sources of New Entrepreneurial growth; Radovic-Marcovic, M.; Nikitovic, Z.; Zanadu, L.Ch., Eds.; Filodiritto Publisher: Bologna, Italy, pp. 370-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)

Search via ReFindit


Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C.F. and Park, H.J. 2014. MNC Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, pp. 38–51.

Search via ReFindit


Mingaleva, Z. and Deputatova, L. 2017. Stimulating of entrepreneurship through the use of HADI cycle technology. In Insights and potential sources of new entrepreneurial growth; Radovic-Marcovic, M.; Nikitovic, Z.; Zanadu, L.Ch., Eds.; Filodiritto Publisher: Bologna, Italy, pp. 72-85. ISBN 978-88-95922-84-3.

Search via ReFindit


Mingaleva, Z., Deputatova, L. and Starkov, Y. 2016. Values and norms in the modern organization as the basis for innovative development. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research (IJABER), 14, pp. 124-133.

Search via ReFindit


Moen, R. and Norman, C. 2009.The History of the PDCA Cycle. Proceedings of the 7th ANQ Congress Tokyo 2009, September 17.

Search via ReFindit


Nonaka, I. and Kogut G. 2009. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20, pp. 635-52.

Search via ReFindit


Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.

Search via ReFindit


Otsuki, A. and Okada, K. 2009. Construction of Optimized Knowledge and New Knowledge Creation Support Tool, Agent and Multi-agent systems: technologies and applications, Proceedings, 5559, pp. 500-513.

Search via ReFindit


Pan, J. and Zhang, J. 2012. The Empirical Study on the Influence of Multinational Corporations’ R&D Investment on China’s High-Tech Industry Innovation Ability. Forum on Science & Technology in China, 1, pp.30-36.

Search via ReFindit


Puente-Díaz R. 2015. Creative Self-Efficacy: An Exploration of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Applied Implications. Journal of Psychology, 150, pp.175-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1051498

Search via ReFindit


Relich, M. 2015. Knowledge creation in the context of new product development. International Scientific Conference on Knowledge for Market Use - Women in Business in the Past and Present, pp. 834-847.

Search via ReFindit


Roper, S. and Hewitt-Dundas, N. 2015. Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and Innovation: Evidence from Matched Patents and Innovation Panel Data. Research Policy, 44, pp. 1327–1340.

Search via ReFindit


Sandri, O., Holdsworth, S. and Thomas, I. 2018. Assessing graduate sustainability capability post-degree completion: Why is it important and what are the challenges? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19, pp. 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408218792127

Search via ReFindit


Sandri, O.J. 2013. Exploring the role and value of creativity in education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 19, pp. 765-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749978

Search via ReFindit


Schulze, A. and Hoegl, M. 2008. Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach. Research Policy, 37, pp. 1742-1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.002

Search via ReFindit


Spender, J.C. 1996. Making knowledge: The basis of dynamic theory of a firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.45-62. Teece, D.F. 2000. Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33, pp. 35-54. Tehseen, S., Yafi, E., Sajilan, S., Ur Rehman, H., Masood Butt, S. 2019. Does ICT based network competence mediate strategic competencys impact on SMEs competitve advantage? An empirical evidence from Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship (Print ISSN: 1099-9264; Online ISSN: 1939-4675), 23(2), 1939-4675-23-2-254 Tsoukas, H. 2009. A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations, Organization Science, 20, pp. 941-957. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0435

Search via ReFindit


Vidic, F. 2013. Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) and Knowledge Creation (KC). International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 6, pp. 103-124.

Search via ReFindit


Williams, C. and Lee, S.H. 2009. Resource allocations, knowledge network characteristics and entrepreneurial orientation of multinational corporations. Research Policy, 30, pp. 1376-1387.

Search via ReFindit