ESC
Clarivate

 
Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from ClarivateTM 2022

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2022) 1.7
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2022) 0.42
Received: 2019-02-15  |  Accepted: 2019-06-02  |  Published: 2019-06-30

Title

Graphic model for evaluating the competitiveness and eco-efficiency of eco-innovative projects


Abstract

Eco-innovation describes the creation of novel and competitively priced goods, processes, systems, services, policies, and procedures that satisfy human needs and improve the quality of life while ensuring sustainable development with minimal use of natural resources and minimal release of toxic substances. This article delves into one of the most pressing problems in improving the assessment of eco-innovative projects meant to effect sustainable development. The article also proposes new criteria for evaluating eco-innovation projects. The purpose is to develop and propose a graphic model by which to assess the innovativeness, competitiveness, and eco-efficiency of eco-innovation projects. In the development of this method, experts applied a methodological approach based on an assessment of the indicators of the innovativeness, competitiveness, and eco-efficiency of an eco-innovation project through the associated construction of a graphic model with indicators divided into nine sectors.


Keywords

graphic model, innovativeness, competitiveness, eco-efficiency, eco-innovative project, technological forecasting, comprehensive assessment


JEL classifications

Q57 , C29


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/344


DOI


Pages

2136-2158


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Mutanov, Galimkair
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan http://www.kaznu.kz
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Ziyadin, Sayabek
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan http://www.kaznu.kz
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Shaikh, Aijaz
University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland https://www.jyu.fi
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

6


Number

4


Issue date

June 2019


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 4494  |  PDF downloads: 1805

References


Abdrakhmanova, M., Mutanov, G., Mamykova, Z., & Tukeyev, U. (2018). Agents Interaction and Queueing System Model of Real Time Control of Students Service Center Load Balancing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11055 LNAI, 349-359 (pp. 349-359). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98443-8_32

Search via ReFindit


Adamczyk, M., Betlej, A., Gondek, J., Ohotina, A. 2019. Technology and sustainable development: towards the future?, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 2003-2016. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(32)

Search via ReFindit


Atari, S., Bakkar, Y., Olaniyi, E. O., Prause, G. 2019. Real options analysis of abatement investments for sulphur emission control compliance. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1062-1087. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(1)

Search via ReFindit


Bente Villadsen, M. J. (2017). Discounted Cash Flow Models. In M. J. Bente Villadsen, Risk and Return for Regulated Industries (pp. 97-116). Academic Press.

Search via ReFindit


Bohdaniuk, O., Buriak, R., Savchuk, V. 2019. Competitiveness of horticultural products as a precondition of industry development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1587-1601. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(3)

Search via ReFindit


Bringer, J. D., Johnston, L. H., & Brackenridge, C. H. (2006). Using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software to develop a grounded theory project. Field methods, 18(3), 245-266.

Search via ReFindit


Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of cleaner production, 18(10-11), 1073-1083. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014

Search via ReFindit


Cluzel, F., Yannou, B., Millet, D., & Leroy, Y. (2016). Eco-ideation and eco-selection of R&D projects portfolio in complex systems industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4329-4343. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.002

Search via ReFindit


Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.

Search via ReFindit


Dudin, M.N., Ivashchenko, N.P., Gurinovich, A.G., Tolmachev, O.M., Sonina, L.A. 2019. Environmental entrepreneurship: characteristics of organization and development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1861-1871. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(22)

Search via ReFindit


Dutra, C. C., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2014). An economic–probabilistic model for project selection and prioritization. International Journal of Project Management, 32(6), 1042-1055. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.12.004

Search via ReFindit


Eddelani, O., El Idrissi, N. E., Monni, S. 2019. Territorialized forms of production in Morocco: provisional assessment for an own model in gestation, Insights into Regional Development 1(1): 6-18. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.1(1)

Search via ReFindit


Huang, X., Zhao, T., & Kudratova, S. (2016). Uncertain mean-variance and mean-semivariance models for optimal project selection and scheduling. Knowledge-Based Systems, 93, 1-11.

Search via ReFindit


Jeng, D. J. F., & Huang, K. H. (2015). Strategic project portfolio selection for national research institutes. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2305-2311.

Search via ReFindit


Karasakal, E., & Aker, P. (2017). A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problem. Omega, 73, 79-92.

Search via ReFindit


Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232-240.

Search via ReFindit


Lambrechts, W., Gelderman, C. J., Semeijn, J., & Verhoeven, E. (2019). The role of individual sustainability competences in eco-design building projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1631-1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.084

Search via ReFindit


Leach, T. H., Winslow, L. A., Acker, F. W., Bloomfield, J. A., Boylen, C. W., Bukaveckas, P. A., Charles, D. F., Daniels, R. A., Driscoll, C. T., Eichler, L. W., Farrell, J. L., Funk, C. S., Goodrich, C. A., Michelena, T. M., Nierzwicki-Bauer, S. A., Roy, K. M., Shaw, W. H., Sutherland, J. W., Swinton, M. W., … Rose, K. C. (2018). Long-term dataset on aquatic responses to concurrent climate change and recovery from acidification. Scientific Data, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.59

Search via ReFindit


Levidow, L., Lindgaard-Jørgensen, P., Nilsson, Å., Skenhall, S. A., & Assimacopoulos, D. (2016). Process eco-innovation: assessing meso-level eco-efficiency in industrial water-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 110, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.086

Search via ReFindit


López, F. J. D., & Montalvo, C. (2015). A comprehensive review of the evolving and cumulative nature of eco-innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of cleaner production, 102, 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.007

Search via ReFindit


Montalvo, C., Diaz-Lopez, F., & Brandes, F. (2011). Eco-innovation Opportunities in Nine Sectors of the European Economy. European Sector Innovation Watch. European Commission, Directorate General Enterprise and Industry, Brussels.

Search via ReFindit


Mutanov, G. (2015). Mathematical Methods and Models in Economic Planning, Management and Budgeting (p. 364). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Search via ReFindit


Mutanov, G., Milosz, M., Kozhanova, A. (2018). Systematically dynamic model-building approach of oil company. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13 (10), 3396-3401. http://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=jeasci.2018.3396.3401

Search via ReFindit


Mutanov, G., Milosz, M., Saxenbayeva, Z., & Kozhanova, A. (2018). Investments Decision Making on the Basis of System Dynamics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, (769), 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76081-0_25

Search via ReFindit


Padhy, R. K., & Sahu, S. (2011). A real option based Six Sigma project evaluation and selection model. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1091-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.011

Search via ReFindit


Reid, A., & Miedzinski, M. (2008). Eco-innovation: final report for sectoral innovation watch. SYSTEMATIC Eco-Innovation Report.

Search via ReFindit


Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2016). The "economic–finance interface" for eco-innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 1012-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.005

Search via ReFindit


Shvetsova, O.A.; Rodionova, E.A.; Epstein, M. Z. 2018. Evaluation of investment projects under uncertainty: multi-criteria approach using interval data. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(4), 914-928. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.4(15)

Search via ReFindit


Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., & Smith, M. S. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis.

Search via ReFindit


Triebswetter, U., & Wackerbauer, J. (2008). Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(14), 1484-1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.09.003

Search via ReFindit


Tvaronavičienė, M. 2018. Towards sustainable and secure development: energy efficiency peculiarities in transport sector. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.7.4(9)

Search via ReFindit


Woodrum, E. (1984). "Mainstreaming" content analysis in social science: Methodological advantages, obstacles, and solutions. Social Science Research, 13(1), 1-19.

Search via ReFindit


Yin, S., Ding, S. X., Xie, X., & Luo, H. (2014). A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(11), 6418-6428.

Search via ReFindit


Zhao, J., Yang, Y., Zhao, Q., & Zhao, Z. (2017). Effects of ecological restoration projects on changes in land cover: A case study on the Loess Plateau in China. Scientific reports, 7, 44496.

Search via ReFindit


Žižlavský, O. (2014). Net present value approach: method for economic assessment of innovation projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 506-512.

Search via ReFindit