Received:
2019-01-16 | Accepted:
2019-03-27 | Published:
2019-06-30
Title
Towards the innovation-focused industry development in a climate of digitalization: the case of Russia
Abstract
Aims: the purpose of this paper is to determine, based on an analysis of innovation processes within industry, some of the key issues in and priorities for the management of the technological development of the national economy through the example of Russia. Results: the paper identifies some of the key trends in and characteristics of the development of Russia’s industrial complex and the potential for integrating it into the world economic system using the tools of marketing. The authors prove that in today’s realities it is advisable to develop appropriate organizational-economic forms of entrepreneurship to stimulate innovation activity. The paper identifies some of the key factors influencing investment processes in machinery manufacturing (workforce qualifications, production volume, dynamics of demand for the sector’s output, level of innovation activity within the sector, etc.). Conclusions: the paper identifies a set of key marketing tools for stimulating innovation processes within the industrial complex in a climate of the development of a digital economy in Russia by reference to different phases in the lifecycle of the innovation process. The authors identify the key focus of innovation activity, which is a focus on the creation of network added value. The paper brings forward a client-oriented model of expanded innovation process based on the building of technological chains by industrial companies.
Keywords
industrial complex, technological development, tools of marketing, digital economy, technological platforms
JEL classifications
O10
, O30
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/328
DOI
Pages
1897-1906
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Anderson, L.; & Wladawsky-Berger, I. 2016. The 4 things it takes to succeed in the digital economy. https://hbr.org/2016/03/the-4-things-it-takes-to-succeed-in-the-digital-economy
Search via ReFindit
Androniceanu, A.; Krajčík, V. 2017. Integrated performance management system in a globalized organization. Conference: Finance and performance of firms in science, education and practice, 26-27 April, 2017, Zlin, Czech Republic, Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Finance and Performance of Firms in Science, pp. 30-43. ISBN 978-80-7454-653-2.
Search via ReFindit
Australian Trade and Investment Commission. 2010. Market Snapshot – China. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors (QDII). http://docshare.tips/china-market-snapshot-qdii_574e0e9fb6d87f411f8b5fab.html
Search via ReFindit
Buckley, P. J.; Clegg, L. J.; & Wang, C. 2007. Is the relationship between inward FDI and spillover effects linear? An empirical examination of the case of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3): 447–459. Eddelani, O.; El Idrissi, N. E.; Monni, S. 2019. Territorialized forms of production in Morocco: provisional assessment for an own model in gestation, Insights into Regional Development 1(1): 6-18. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.1(1)
Search via ReFindit
European Commission. 2014. Expert Group on Taxation of the Digital Economy. Working paper: Digital economy – facts & figures. https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/good_governance_matters/digital/2014-03-13_fact_figures.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Expert RA. 2018. Krupneishie kompanii Rossii, realizuyushchie innovatsionnye proekty ⦋Russia’s largest companies engaged in the implementation of innovation projects⦌. https://raexpert.ru/researches/expert-inno/part5/
Search via ReFindit
Gnezdova, J. V.; Kugelev, I. M.; Romanova, I. N.; & Romanova, J. A. 2016. Conceptual model of the territorial manufacturing cooperative system use in Russia. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 4(21): 82–87. Goncharenko, O.; Tohochynskyi, O.; Sіrenko, K.; Chebonenko, S.; Tretiak, H. 2019. Innovative performance as precondition of sustainable and secure development, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 8(3): 531-544. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.8.3(19)
Search via ReFindit
Lenchuk, E. B.; Vlaskin, G. A. 2010. Klasternyi podkhod v strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiya zarubezhnykh stran [The use of a cluster-based approach as part of a strategy of innovation-driven development in foreign countries]. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, 5; 38–51.
Search via ReFindit
Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. 2009. Natsional'naya innovatsionnaya sistema i gosudarstvennaya innovatsionnaya politika Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Bazovyi doklad k obzoru OESR natsional'noi innovatsionnoi sistemy Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The National Innovation System of the Russian Federation and Russia’s Government policy on innovation. A fundamental report on the OECD’s survey of the National Innovation System of the Russian Federation]. www.csr-nw.ru/files/csr/file_content_174.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Morrar, R.; Arman, H.; Mousa, S. 2017. The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 12–20. https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Morrar_et_al_TIMReview_November2017.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Novikov, A. 2015. Osobennosti IR-praktiki rossiiskogo emitenta v Kitae i drugikh stranakh [Characteristics of IR practices by Russian securities issuers in China and other countries]. Vestnik NP ARFI, 13: 51–61.
Search via ReFindit
Petrenko, Y.; Vechkinzova, E.; Antonov, V. 2019. Transition from the industrial clusters to the smart specialization of the regions in Kazakhstan, Insights into Regional Development 1(2): 118-128. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.2(3)
Search via ReFindit
Pfohl, H.-C.; Yahsi, B.; & Kurnaz, T. 2015. The impact of Industry 4.0 on the supply chain. In W. Kersten, T. Blecker, & C. M. Ringle (Eds.), Innovations and strategies for logistics and supply chains, 31. Hamburg, Germany: Epubli.
Search via ReFindit
PwC. 2017. Money Tree. Navigator venchurnogo rynka. Obzor rynka venchurnoi industrii Rossii za 2016 god [MoneyTree™: Venture Market Navigator. The 2016 survey of Russia’s venture capital industry]. http://www.rvc.ru/upload/iblock/905/money-tree-rus-2016.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Qin, J.; Liu, Y.; & Grosvenor, R. 2016. A categorical framework of manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia CIRP, 52: 173–178. Razminienė, K., Tvaronavičienė, M. 2018. Towards clusters’ performance evaluation: the system of indicators. 10th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2018” May 3–4, 2018, Vilnius, Lithuania Section: Contemporary Issues in Economics Engineering ISSN 2029-4441/eISSN 2029-929X ISBN 978-609-476-119-5 eISBN 978-609-476-118-8 https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2018.06 http://www.bm.vgtu.lt
Search via ReFindit
Rosstat. (n.d.). Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik [Russian statistics yearbook]. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1135087342078
Search via ReFindit
Sekerin, V. D.; Avramenko, S. A.; Veselovsky, M. Y.; & Aleksakhina, V. G. 2014. B2G market: The essence and statistical analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(6): 1104–1108.
Search via ReFindit
Sölvell, Ö.; Lindqvist, G.; & Ketels, C. 2003. The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Stockholm, Sweden: Bromma tryck AB.
Search via ReFindit
Stančík, J. 2007. Horizontal and vertical FDI spillovers: Recent evidence from the Czech Republic. https://cerge-ei.cz/pdf/wp/Wp340.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Tkachenko, V.; Kwilinski, A.; Korystin, O.; Svyrydiuk, N.; Tkachenko, I. 2019. Assessment of information technologies influence on financial security of economy, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 8(3): 375-385. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.8.3(7)
Search via ReFindit
Top 15 reitinga “TekhUspekh” – 2016 ⦋TekhUspekh Top-15 Rankings in 2016⦌. (n.d.). http://www.ratingtechup.ru/rate/2016/
Search via ReFindit
Tvaronavičienė, M. 2017. Clusters, innovations and energy efficiency: if relantionship could be traced, Marketing and Management of Innovations 2: 382 - 391 http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.2-35
Search via ReFindit
Tvaronavičienė, M., Razminienė K. 2017. Towards competitive regional development through clusters: approaches to their performance evaluation, Journal of Competitiveness, 9(4): 133 - 147, https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.04.09
Search via ReFindit
Veselovsky, M. Y.; Abrashkin, M. S.; Aleksakhina, V. G.; & Pogodina, T. V. 2015. Features of state regulation of the economy in terms of its transition to innovative way of development. Asian Social Science, 11(1); 288–296.
Search via ReFindit
Veselovsky, M. Y.; Gnezdova, J. V.; Menshikova, M. A.; Izmailova, M. A.; & Romanova, J. A. 2015. Mechanism of use of public and private partnership in order to develop innovative economy. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 10(5): 625–634.
Search via ReFindit
Zeibote, Z.; Volkova, T.; Todorov, K. 2019. The impact of globalization on regional development and competitiveness: cases of selected regions, Insights into Regional Development 1(1): 33-47. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.1(3)
Search via ReFindit
Zemlickiene, V.; Mačiulis, A.; Tvaronavičienė, M. 2017. Factors impacting the commercial potential of technologies: expert approach, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(2): 410-427 https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1271061
Search via ReFindit
RSS 1.0
