Received:
2019-01-10 | Accepted:
2019-05-15 | Published:
2019-06-30
Title
Assessment of forest enterprises' performance: integrating economic security and ecological impact
Abstract
At the stage of the strategic or tactical managerial decisions justification, it is important to choose the right approach, verify proper information sources, develop methods to identify the status of the enterprise. The mentioned prerequisites necessitate the development of methodological tools for the formation of appropriate information and analytical support. The aim of the study is to substantiate the methodology of assessing the ecological and economic security of forestry farms and to test this methodology basing on the data received from state forestry enterprises. The subject of the study is the methodological aspects of developing the methodic for assessing the ecological and economic security of forests, taking into account the peculiarities of their functioning as complex ecological-economic systems. The latter determines the essence of the hypothesis, which requires the use of an integrated indicator for assessing the security of forestry enterprises, taking into account interdependent and interconnected economic and environmental components. Methodic for assessing the ecological and economic security of forest holdings is a sequence of stages that ensure the formation of an information base for the research; selection of indicators; their processing using component, index, normative methods; interpretation of the results of calculations. The authors specify the content of the main terms: ecological, economic, financial, techno-technological, social security, safety of forest use, reforestation, forest protection activity. The methodic has been tested on the data from forest enterprises in Volyn and Rivne regions of Ukraine. The authors obtained adequate results, which indicate a high and satisfactory level of ecological and economic security of these enterprises in 2017. The strengths and weaknesses of the enterprises and the factors that influenced them were revealed. The methodology for assessing ecological and economic security is a tool for obtaining the necessary information about the status of the enterprise in order to substantiate practical recommendations for the further development of forestry as a coherent and stable system.
Keywords
assessment, ecological and economic security, forest resources, forestry
JEL classifications
C13
, M21
, O13
, Q23
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/320
DOI
Pages
1784-1797
Funding
The research was performed within the scientific researches framework "Management of socioecological and economic security" (state registration number 0117U002302) conducted at Lesia Ukrainka Eastern European National University.
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Artyushok, V. S. 2012. Kry`teriyi vidpovidnosti diyal`nosti lisogospodars`ky`x pidpry`yemstv strategichnij cili v umovax stalogo rozvy`tku [Criteria forestry enterprises of strategic objectives in terms of sustainable development], Scientific Proceedings of the National University «Ostroh Academy»: Economy. 19, 95-98. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nznuoa_2012_19_22
Search via ReFindit
Bilbao-Terol, A., Arenas-Parra, M., Alvarez-Otero, S., & Cañal-Fernández, V. (2019). Integrating corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Management Decision, 57(2), 324-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2018-0290
Search via ReFindit
Bogdanov, V., Ilysheva N., Baldesku E., Zakirov U. 2016. A model of the correlation between economic development and environmental performance based on the company's non-financial reporting data, The Economy of the Region, 12(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.17059/2016-1-7
Search via ReFindit
Cherchyk A. 2016. Ocinka ekologo-ekonomichnoyi bezpeky` pidpry`yemstv lisogospodars`koyi sfery [The assessment of ecological-economical security of the forestry enterprise], Economic Innovation, 61, 365-376.
Search via ReFindit
Cherchyk L. 2016. Konceptual`ni osnovy` formuvannya sy`stemy` socioekologoekonomichnoyi bezpeky [Conceptual basis for the formation system of Socioecological and economic security], Economic Forum, 2, 167-175. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecfor_2016_2_27
Search via ReFindit
Domashenko, M., Shkola V., Klimenko, O. 2014. Otsinka rivnia ekoloho-ekonomichnoi bezpeky zovnishnoekonomichnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Valuation of ecological and economic security of International Business], Mechanism of Economic Regulation, 1, 39-47. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mre_2014_1_5
Search via ReFindit
Dovbnya, S., Gichova, N. 2008. Diagnosty`ka ekonomichnoyi bezpeky` pidpry`yemstva yak instrument vy`znachennya napryamkiv jogo innovacijnogo rozvy`tku [Enterprise economic safety diagnostics as a tool of its innovative development directions definition], Economic Newsletter of the NMU. Series «Economics of Enterprises», 3 (23), 36-42
Search via ReFindit
Harrington, E.C. 1965. The Desirability Function. Industrial Quality Control, 21, April, 494-498.
Search via ReFindit
Hasanudin, A.I., Yuliansyah, Y., Said, J., Susilowati, Ch.; Muafi. 2019. Management control system, corporate social responsibility, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1154-1168. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(21)
Search via ReFindit
Hilkevics, S., Semakina, V. 2019. The classification and comparison of business ratios analysis methods. Insights into Regional Development, 1(1), 48-57. http://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2019.1.1(4)
Search via ReFindit
Ilysheva, N., Karanina, E., Elena Baldesku, Ulugbek Zakirov 2017. Detection of the Interdependence of Economic Development and Environmental Performance at the Industry Level, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(4), 19-29. http://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2017.13-4.2
Search via ReFindit
Khvesik, M., Stepanenko, A., Obykhod, G. et al. 2014. Ekologichna i pry`rodno-texnogenna bezpeka Ukrayiny` v regional`nomu vy`miri [Ecological and natural-technogenic security of Ukraine in the regional dimension], «Institute of Natural Resources Economics and Sustainable Development of NAS of Ukraine».
Search via ReFindit
Kubaienko, A. 2018. Activation of the Economic Security of Ukraine in Terms of the European, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(2), 91-114. http://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.6
Search via ReFindit
Kuklin, A. A., Kuklina, L. N., & Korobkov, I. V. 2018. Diagnostics of region’s eco-economic security. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 18(5.3): 215-224. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/5.3/S28.027
Search via ReFindit
Kuril, J. 2018. Public administration for safe and secure environment: case of Slovak Republic. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 493-501. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(6)
Search via ReFindit
Mikhaylov, A. S., Mikhaylova, A. A., Savchina, O. V. 2018. Innovation security of cross-border innovative milieu. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(2), 754-766. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(19)
Search via ReFindit
Narkunienė, J., Ulbinaitė, A. 2018. Comparative analysis of company performance evaluation methods. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 125-138. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(10)
Search via ReFindit
Nikitina, M. G., Pobirchenko, V. V., Shutaieva, E. A., Karlova, A. I. 2018. The investment component in a nation’s economic security: the case of the Russian Federation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(2), 958-967. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(32)
Search via ReFindit
Nikolenko, L., Jurakovskiy, E., Ivanyuta, N., Andronik, O., Sharkovska, S. 2018. Investment policy of governance of economic security of agrarian sector of Ukraine on the basis of Theory of Fuzzy Logics. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(4), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-4.9
Search via ReFindit
Prypoten, V. 2013. Formuvannia informatsiinoi bazy za rezultatamy otsiniuvannia ekoloho-ekonomichnoi bezpeky promyslovoho pidpryiemstva [Forming the information base for the evaluation of environmental and economic safety of industrial enterprises], Biznesinform, 10: 151–156. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/binf_2013_10_29
Search via ReFindit
Tagiltseva, J. A., Drozdov, N. A. 2017. Monitoring Socio-Ecological-Economic Security of Management Environmental Decisions Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus), 2017 IEEE Conference of Russian, 2017, 1366-1370. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConRus.2017.7910821
Search via ReFindit
Yevdokimova, M., Zamlynskyi, V., Kuznietsov, E., Sakovska, O., Anatolii, H. 2018. Evolution of social responsibility applied to the concept of sustainable development: mainstream of the 20th century. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 8(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.8.1(6)
Search via ReFindit
Zemguliene, J., Valukonis, M. 2018. Structured literature review on business process performance analysis and evaluation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 226-252. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(15)
Search via ReFindit
Нromushyna, L. 2011. The nature and principles of ecologicaleconomic security of agricultural enterprises, Economy. Management. Innovations, No. 2. . http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/eui_2011_2_53
Search via ReFindit