Received:
2018-07-16 | Accepted:
2018-10-25 | Published:
2018-12-30
Title
Intellectual input of development by knowledge-based economy: problems of measuring in countries with developing markets
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, sales volumes in the knowledge-intensive sectors of the developed world grew about 2 times faster than in the manufacturing industry. It is no coincidence that the share of knowledge-intensive sectors of the manufacturing industry and the service sector today accounts for an average of more than half the GDP of the leading industrial countries. A new, knowledge-based economy creates new resources that effectively replace natural resources and human intellect. A high-end economy is the creation of new, artificial energy and artificial intelligence and their use in all sectors of the economy. In addition, a knowledge-intensive economy is a large-scale use of scientific developments, a new content of labor and the attitude of all its participants to it. A high-tech economy is born and is able to develop in a social environment with a sufficient level of intellectual development of society. The creation of such an economy requires not only a high level of development and implementation of new resource-creating and resource-saving technologies, but also a mass knowledge of new technologies, skills to use in production and everyday life. A high-tech economy is formed in conditions of sufficient intellectual security. With all this, the urgency of finding answers to the questions is growing: what conditions are necessary for the creation and functioning of a knowledge-based economy. In this regard, firstly, the article compares the level of development of human resources in the Republic of Kazakhstan with other countries of the world, which allows us to conclude that in terms of quantitative indicators (coverage of primary, secondary, vocational and higher education, life expectancy), our country has average positions in the world ranking. Secondly, in order to identify the relationship between a number of indicators of the method of assessing intellectual security in Kazakhstan, a correlation analysis for 2004-2017 was conducted. This article expands the knowledge on methods of assessing intellectual security for the development of a knowledge-based economy in developing countries.
Keywords
knowledge-based economy, intellectual potential, evaluation of intellectual potential, intellectual provision
JEL classifications
J24
, O15
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/248
DOI
Pages
711-728
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Journal title
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues
Volume
6
Number
2
Issue date
December 2018
Issue DOI
ISSN
ISSN 2345-0282 (online)
Publisher
VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania
Cited
Article views & downloads
HTML views: 5183 | PDF downloads: 2086
References
Balatsky OF (2004). Theoretical problems of assessing the economic potential of the region, the company, the enterprise. Vіsnik SumDU, No. 9 (68), pp. 84-95.
Search via ReFindit
Bec, Brigita (2014). Moč intelektualnega kapitala. 20. 8. 2015. http://www.poslovnisvet.si/vodenje/moc-intelektualnega-kapitala/
Search via ReFindit
Bontis, N. (2004). National Intellectual Capital Index: A United Nations Initiative for the Arab Region, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5 Issue: 1, pp.13-39, https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410512905
Search via ReFindit
Druncker, P. (1992). The New Society of Organizations, Harvard Business Review, September-October.
Search via ReFindit
European Commission. (2013). Comparing the innovation performance of the EU Member States, MEMO / 13/274
Search via ReFindit
Glazyev S.Yu. (2014). Strategic preconditions for modernization and innovation development of the Russian economy. Moscow: GUU, 274 p.
Search via ReFindit
Illyashenko S.M. (2004). Management and marketing of innovations. Sumy: VTD University Book, 616 p.
Search via ReFindit
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (1998). The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction. Study 7, IFAC, New York.
Search via ReFindit
Lev, B., & Daum, J.H. (2004). The Dominance of Intangible Assets: Consequences for Enterprise Management and Corporate Reporting. Measuring Business Excellence, 8 (1), 1-6. 410524694 https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040
Search via ReFindit
Lin Yeh-Yun, Carol and Leif Edvinsson. (2010). National intellectual capital: comparison of the Nordic countries. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Search via ReFindit
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1999). Guidelines for OECD Symposium, International Symposium Measuring Reporting, Intellectual Capital: Experiences, Issues, and Prospects, June, Amsterdam, OECD, Paris.
Search via ReFindit
Romilio Labra, M., & Paloma Sánchez. (2013). National intellectual capital assessment models: a literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14 (4), 582-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2012-0100
Search via ReFindit
Skyrme, J. David (2007): Measuring Knowledge: A Plethora of Methods. David Skyrme Associates. Dostopno prek: 6. 3. 2015. http://www.skyrme.com/insights/24kmeas.htm
Search via ReFindit
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1998). HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 1998 New York Oxford Oxford University Press
Search via ReFindit
World Bank. (1999). World development indicators 1999 (English). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/705141468741325522/World-development-indicators-1999
Search via ReFindit