ESC

Clarivate

JCR Category: Business in ESCI edition

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues Open access
Journal Impact FactorTM (2023) 1.2 Q4
Journal Citation IndicatorTM (2023) 0.33 Q3
Received: 2018-02-15  |  Accepted: 2018-04-20  |  Published: 2018-06-30

Title

Models for the interaction between space services providers and manufacturers of space vehicles


Abstract

The authors have formed the space market structure which is distinguished by the junctional formation of the summed demand for a product or service between the participants at the same stage, which serves as a basis for the formation of demand at the next stages. The peculiarities of participants’ interaction on the space services market are associated with incomplete awareness. It is advisable to use the methodological approach considered in the theory of contracts in the case of asymmetric information to develop models of interaction between market participants. Thus, based on the theory of contracts and taking into account the specifics of interaction in this article the authors have described the models for the generation of an optimal contract for the manufacturer of space vehicles and space services providers. The models are presented for the cases with symmetric and asymmetric information. As a result of solution of the task for the generation of an optimal contract, such parameters of the contract as satellite performance, the price of its information throughput unit, as well as the cumulative indicator of its technical and operational characteristics can be found in the course of interaction between these participants of the space market. The determined parameters of the contract allow maximizing the profit of the manufacturer of space vehicles.


Keywords

decision model, contract theory, world space market, generation of an optimal contract, information symmetry, information asymmetry


JEL classifications

C70 , L11 , L14


URI

http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/187


DOI


HAL


Pages

846-857


This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors

Ivanov, Dmitry
Samara State Aerospace University (National Research University), Samara, Russian Federation https://ssau.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Belyaeva, Elena
Samara State Aerospace University (National Research University), Samara, Russian Federation https://ssau.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Kurilova, Anastasia
Togliatti State University, Tolyatti, Russian Federation https://www.tltsu.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Popkova, Elena
Volgograd State Technical University, Volgograd, Russian Federation http://vstu.ru
Articles by this author in: CrossRef |  Google Scholar

Journal title

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues

Volume

5


Number

4


Issue date

June 2018


Issue DOI


ISSN

ISSN 2345-0282 (online)


Publisher

VšĮ Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Vilnius, Lithuania

Cited

Google Scholar

Article views & downloads

HTML views: 3988  |  PDF downloads: 1632

References


Aase, K.K. 2009. The Nash bargaining solution vs. equilibrium in a reinsurance syndicate. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, (3), pp. 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461230802425834

Search via ReFindit


Aase, K.K. 2017. Optimal insurance policies in the presence of costs. Risks, 5(3), p. 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks5030046

Search via ReFindit


Araujo, A., Moreira, H. 2010. Adverse selection problems without the Spence-Mirrlees condition. Journal of Economic Theory, 145 (3), pp. 1113-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2010.02.010

Search via ReFindit


Ardalan, F.; Almasi, N. A.; Atasheneh, M. 2017. Effects of contractor and employer's obligations in buy back contracts: case study of oil exporting country. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(2), pp. 345-356. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(13)

Search via ReFindit


Asimit, A., V.; Bignozzi, V.; Cheung, K.C.; Hu, J.; Kim, E.S. 2017. Robust and Pareto optimality of insurance contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 262, pp. 720-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.029

Search via ReFindit


Balbás, A., Balbás, B., Balbás, R. 2013. Good deals in markets with friction. Quantitative Finance, 13(6), pp. 827-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2013.780132

Search via ReFindit


Balbás, B. Balbás, R. Balbás, A., 2014. Optimal reinsurance under risk and uncertainty. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 60 (2015), pp. 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.11.001

Search via ReFindit


Bocindzer S. 2017. “Space as business” [“Kosmoskakbiznes”], available at: . https://www.roscosmos.ru/media/files/docs/2017/SpAsBus/1_bocindzer.euroconsult.-.roscosmos.1.ru.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Boonen, T.J. 2016. Nash equilibria of over-the-counter bargaining for insurance risk redistributions: The role of a regulator. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), pp. 955-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.062

Search via ReFindit


Borch, K. 1962. Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica, 30 (1962), pp. 424-444. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909887

Search via ReFindit


Bossaerts, P., Ghirardato, P., Guarnaschelli, S., Zame, W.R. 2010. Ambiguity in asset markets: Theory and experiment. Review of Financial Studies, 23(4), pp. 1325-1359. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp106

Search via ReFindit


Kurz, M., Hart, S. 1982. Pareto-optimal Nash equilibria are competitive in a repeated economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 28 (2), pp. 320-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90064-3

Search via ReFindit


Nash, J.F. 1950. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of the USA, 36, pp. 48-49.

Search via ReFindit


Nash, J.F. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, pp. 155-162.

Search via ReFindit


Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A. 1964. A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press Cambridge

Search via ReFindit


Quiggin, J., Chambers, R.G. 2009. Bargaining power and efficiency in insurance contracts. GENEVA Risk and Insurance Review, 34 (1), pp. 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1057/grir.2008.15

Search via ReFindit


SIA State of Satellite Industry Report. 2017. The Tauri group, 33 p., available at: https://www.sia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SIA-SSIR-2017.pdf

Search via ReFindit


Zhou, R., Li, J.S.H., Tan, K.S. 2015. Modeling longevity risk transfers as Nash bargaining problems: Methodology and insights. Economic Modelling, 51, pp. 460-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.019

Search via ReFindit