Received:
2023-12-11 | Accepted:
2024-03-26 | Published:
2024-06-30
Title
Role of social media in spreading conspiracy theories
Abstract
The development of human civilization is currently – in the middle of the third decade of the third millennium – highly dynamic, inextricably linked to the development and introduction of new, modern technologies in all spheres or sectors of society. Information and communication technology is one of the most dynamically developing sectors. The wide use of various advanced sys-tems, tools, and smart devices in connection with the mass use of the Internet and a wide range of interactive social media platforms brings a new way of communication among people and searching, receiving, and spreading information. Such developments bring many positives but also negatives in the form of abuse – especially of social media – to spread misleading, altered, distorted, deceptive and/or invented information, for example, in the form of different conspiracy theories to influence people's thinking and actions. Some conspir-acy theories can be just harmless fun or an expression of a certain disbelief or scepticism. However, some can be very dangerous; they can be part of hybrid threats spread by state and/or non-state actors to disrupt the functioning of democratic societies, undermining trust in democratic institutions, principles, rules, etc. That is why today, conspiracy theories represent a threat and a challenge to society, especially democratic society, and that is also why the authors of this paper deal with them as part of the interdisciplinary scientific research carried out.
Keywords
conspiracy theories, hybrid threats, democratic society, modern technologies, media, social networks
JEL classifications
O33
, Z00
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1189
DOI
Pages
31-43
Funding
This work was supported by the Agency for the Support of Research and Development on the basis of Contract no. APVV-20-0334.
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism, and counterterrorism. Demos.
Search via ReFindit
Byford, J. (2011). Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Search via ReFindit
Cassam, Q. (2023). Conspiracy Theories. Society, 60(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00816-1
Search via ReFindit
Chayinska, M., & Minescu, A. (2018). “They've conspired against us”: Understanding the role of social identification and conspiracy beliefs in justification of ingroup collective behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 990-998. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2511
Search via ReFindit
Danyk, Y., Maliarchuk, T., & Briggs, C. (2017). Hybrid War: High-tech, Information and Cyber Conflicts. Connections, 16(2) 5-24. https://connections-qj.org/article/hybrid-war-high-tech-information-and-cyber-conflicts
Search via ReFindit
Daunt, K. L., Greer, D. A., Jin, H. S., & Orpen, I. (2023). Who believes political fake news? The role of conspiracy mentality, patriotism, perceived threat to freedom, media literacy and concern for disinformation. Internet Research, 33(5), 1849-1870. http://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-07-2022-0565
Search via ReFindit
De Zeeuw, D., Hagen, S., Peeters, S., & Jokubauskaite, E. (2020). Tracing notification: A cross-platform analysis of the QAnon con-spiracy theory. First Monday, 25(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i11.10643
Search via ReFindit
EU. (2016). Joint Framework on Countering Hybrid Threats. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/de-tail/it/MEMO_16_1250
Search via ReFindit
EÚ. (2018). A Europe that Protects: Countering Hybrid Threats. European External Action Service, 2018. https://www.dsn.gob.es/sites/dsn/files/hybrid_threats_en_final.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Gambini, M., Tardelli, S., Tesconi, M. (2024). The anatomy of conspiracy theorists: Unveiling traits using a comprehensive Twitter dataset. Computer Communications, 217, 25-40. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2024.01.027
Search via ReFindit
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731-742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
Search via ReFindit
Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30-37. ISSN 1873-3549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023
Search via ReFindit
Greig, C. (2020). Conspiracies. Arcturus Publishing.
Search via ReFindit
Groh, D. (1987). The temptation of conspiracy theory, or: Why do bad things happen to good people? Part I: Preliminary draft of a theory of conspiracy theories. In Graumann, C. F., & Moscovici, S. (eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy, pp. 1-13. Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_1
Search via ReFindit
Hajdúková, T. (2023). Techniques for Manipulating Public Opinion in the Online Space During an Election Campaign as a Hybrid Threat. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 13(1) 14-23. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0002
Search via ReFindit
Hajdúková, T., & Šišulák, S. (2022). Abuse of modern means of communication to manipulate public opinion. In: INTED 2022: Inter-national Technology, Education and Development Conference – Conference Proceedings. Barcelona: IATED, 2022, pp. 1992-2000. ISBN 978-84-09-37758-9.
Search via ReFindit
Hybrid Centre of Excellence. (2022). Hybrid Threats as a concept. The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. https://www.hybridcoe.fi/hybrid-threats-as-a-phenomenon/
Search via ReFindit
Ivančík, R. (2016). Teoretické východiská skúmania problematiky hybridnej vojny – vojny 21. storočia. Slovak Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 130-156. https://fmv.euba.sk/www_write/files/dokumenty/veda-vyskum/medzinarodne-vztahy/ar-chiv/2016/2/mv_2016_2_130-156_ivancik.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Ivančík, R. (2022). Konšpiračné teórie – základné teoretické východiská. Auspicia, 19(1), 8-20. https://vsers.cz/wp-content/up-loads/2022/10/Auspicia_1_2022.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Ivančík, R., & Nečas, P. (2022). On disinformation as a hybrid threat spread through social networks. Entrepreneurship and Sustaina-bility Issues, 10(1), 344-357. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.10.1(18)
Search via ReFindit
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K.M. (2014a). The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions. PLoS ONE 9(2): e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
Search via ReFindit
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K.M. (2014b). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases the intention to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018
Search via ReFindit
Jurčák, V., & Turac, J. (2018). Hybridné vojny – výzva pre NATO. In Bezpečnostné fórum 2018 – zborník vedeckých prác z medzinárod-nej vedeckej konferencie. Banská Bystrica: Interpolis, p. 177-184.
Search via ReFindit
Kavan, Š. (2021). Selected social impacts and measures resulting from the Covid-19 epidemic in the Czech Republic on the specific example of the South Bohemian Region. Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), 224-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13272
Search via ReFindit
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2024). I can't stop myself! Doomscrolling, conspiracy theories, and trust in social media. Atlantic Journal of Communication. Early Access, FEB 2024 http://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2024.2316844
Search via ReFindit
Krekó, P. (2015). Conspiracy theory as collective motivated cognition. In Bilewicz, M., Cichocka, A., & Soral, W. (eds.) The Psychology of Conspiracy, pp. 80-94. Routledge.
Search via ReFindit
Kříž, Z., Schevcuk, Z., & Števkov, P. (2015). Hybridní válka jako fenomén v bezpečnostním prostředí Evropy. Jagelo 2000, 29 p. ISBN 978-80-904850-4-4.
Search via ReFindit
Lonardo, L. (2021). EU Law against hybrid threats. A first assessment. European Papers, 6(2), 1075-1096. 10.15166/2499-8249/514
Search via ReFindit
Mahl D., Zeng J., & Schäfer M.S. (2021). From “NASA Lies" to "Reptilian Eyes": Mapping communication about 10 conspiracy theo-ries, their communities, and main propagators on Twitter. Soc. Media + Society, 7(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211017482
Search via ReFindit
Manko, O., & Mikhieiev, Y. (2018). Defining the Concept of 'Hybrid Warfare' Based on Analysis of Russian Agression against Ukraine. Connections. Information & Security: An International Journal, 41, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.4107
Search via ReFindit
Mitchell, T. (2024). A Too Intimate Internet: What is Wrong with Precise Audience Selection? Think-Philosophy for Everyone, 23(66), 37-42. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1477175623000337
Search via ReFindit
NATO. (2022). NATO’s response to hybrid threats. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, 2022. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/top-ics_156338.htm
Search via ReFindit
NATO. (2023). Countering hybrid threats. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, 2023. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/top-ics_156338.htm
Search via ReFindit
NBAC. (2021). Hybridné hrozby. Krátky slovník hybridných hrozieb, 2021. https://www.nbu.gov.sk/urad/o-urade/hybridne-hrozby-a-dezinformacie/kratky-slovnik-hybridnych-hrozieb/index.html
Search via ReFindit
Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style (s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952-966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
Search via ReFindit
Puri N., Coomes E.A., Haghbayan H., & Gunaratne K. (2020). Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(11), 2586-2593. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846
Search via ReFindit
Samantray, A., & Pin, P. (2019). Credibility of climate change denial in social media. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0344-4
Search via ReFindit
Sambol, S., Sans, E., Scarfo, J., Kirkovski, M., & Ball, M. (2023). A latent profile approach to the study of conspiracy belief: Identifying the role of executive functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 220, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112537
Search via ReFindit
Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x
Search via ReFindit
Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ac-prof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001
Search via ReFindit
Van Prooijen, J. W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770-788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618774270
Search via ReFindit
Van Prooijen, J.-W. & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333.. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Search via ReFindit
Wang, Z., & Juan, Ch., & Li, X. (2023). Evolutionary Analysis of the Regulation of Data Abuse in Digital Platforms. Systems, 2023, 11(4) 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11040188
Search via ReFindit
YT. 2017. Security Strategy for Society. Yhteiskunnan Turvallisuus. https://turvallisuuskomitea.fi/wp-content/up-loads/2018/04/YTS_2017_english.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Zandee, D., Meer, S., & Stoetman, A. (2021). Hybrid threats: searching for a definition. Netherlands Institute of International Relations. https://www.clingendael.org/pub/2021/countering-hybrid-threats/2-hybrid-threats-searching-for-a-definition/
Search via ReFindit
RSS 1.0
