Received:
2022-11-15 | Accepted:
2023-01-11 | Published:
2023-03-30
Title
Boundaries of the employee's privacy in employment relationship
Abstract
This article analyses the specifics of implementing employee privacy obligations in employment relationships. In employment relations, the employer has a general duty to make the employee aware of the local legislation governing his or her work. In this context, there is a clash between two legally protected interests: on the one hand, the employer's interest in protecting the business, ensuring business processes, the security of assets and the health and safety of employees, and on the other hand, the obligation not to infringe the employee's right to privacy. Technical means of monitoring employees are one of the simplest ways of collecting data and Information. At the same time, the question of proportionality of using such means is raised - whether all the Information collected by automated means is necessary to justify the specific purpose of data collection. Collecting data solely for personal interest without setting strict rules on the collection of Information and the limits of the Information collected restricts an employee's right to privacy. An employer is not entitled to collect data (monitoring) to control an employee's work process or behaviour but may record specific data if necessary to protect production, health and safety or to ensure the efficient running of an organisation. However, even in such cases, the employer must take additional measures to minimise such monitoring or evaluate its results as much as possible. The author analyses the problem in the context of the employment relationship, and through the implementation of the employer's obligation to establish specific local rules and the commitment to make the employee aware of those rules (transparency principle).
Keywords
employees' right to privacy, local regulation, limits to the right to privacy, balancing the interests of the employer and employee
JEL classifications
K12
, K24
, K31
URI
http://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1061
DOI
Pages
186-198
Funding
This article was prepared as part of an awareness raising project Solving Privacy Paradox 2: Promoting High Standards of Data Protection as a Fundamental Right at the Workplace (SolPriPa2WORK).
This is an open access issue and all published articles are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Asvanyi, Z (2022). Technology vs privacy at work: The extent and limitations of organizational control mechanisms. MANAGEMENT-Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 27(2) http://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.14
Search via ReFindit
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2016/C 202/02), Retrieved July 9, 2022, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12016P/TXT&from=EN
Search via ReFindit
Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania, https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.8A39C83848CB/asr
Search via ReFindit
CJEU, Case C-177/10 Francisco Javier Rosado Santana v Consejería de Justicia y Administración Pública de la Junta de Andalucía, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0177_SUM&from=GA
Search via ReFindit
CJEU, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2010. Volker und Markus Schecke GbR (C-92/09) and Hartmut Eifert (C-93/09) v Land Hessen, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-92/09&language=en
Search via ReFindit
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania Ruling 8 May 2000 On the compliance of Paragraph 12 of Article 2, Item 3 of Paragraph 2 of Article 7, Paragraph 1 of Article 11 of the Republic of Lithuania’s Law on Operational Activities and Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 1981 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania https://lrkt.lt/en/court-acts/search/170/ta1160/content
Search via ReFindit
Davulis, T. (2018) Commentary on Labour Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Mintis, Vilnius, p.113-120.
Search via ReFindit
Di Stefano, V. (2009). Smuggling Flexibility: Temporary Working Contracts and the 'Implicit Threat' Mechanism. Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1433350 . http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1433350
Search via ReFindit
Dvojmoc, M., & Verboten, M.T (2023). Cyber (in)security of personal data and information in times of digitization. Medicine Law & Society, 15(2), 287-30. http://doi.org/10.18690/mls.15.2.287-304.2022
Search via ReFindit
ECtHR, CASE OF ANTOVIĆ AND MIRKOVIĆ v. MONTENEGRO (Application no. 70838/13), ]} https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-178904%22
Search via ReFindit
ECtHR, CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA (Application no. 61496/08), ],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22JUDGMENTS%22,%22DECISIONS%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-177082%22]} https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22sort%22:[%22kpdate%20Descending%22
Search via ReFindit
ECtHR, CASE OF BURDEN and BURDEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 13378/05), ]} https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-78427%22
Search via ReFindit
ECtHR, CASE OF COPLAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 62617/00), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/?library=ECHR&id=001-79996&filename=CASE%20OF%20COPLAND%20v.%20THE%20UNITED%20KINGDOM.docx&logEvent=False
Search via ReFindit
ECtHR, CASE OF NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY (Application no. 13710/88), ]} https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57887%22
Search via ReFindit
ECtHR, CASE OF SCHALLK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA - 30141/04, ]}; Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC] - 29381/09 and 32684/09 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-9224%22]} https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-912%22
Search via ReFindit
ECtHR, CASE VALLIANATOS AND OTHERS V GREECE (Application nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09), ]} https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-9224%22
Search via ReFindit
European Commision. Opinion 2/2017 on data processing at work - wp249. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/610169/en
Search via ReFindit
European Court of Human Rights. European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
Search via ReFindit
Hueso, LC. et al. (2020). Academic survey about personal data protection. Teoria Y Realidad Constitucional, 46, 15-118 http://doi.org/10.5944/trc.46.2020
Search via ReFindit
Labor Code of the Republic of Lithuania. https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/f6d686707e7011e6b969d7ae07280e89/asr
Search via ReFindit
Limba, T., Driaunys, K., Kiskis, M., Sidlauskas, A. (2020). Development of Digital Contents: Privacy Policy Model under the General Data Protection Regulation and User-Friendly Interface. Transformations in Business & Economics, Vol. 19, No 1(49), pp.133-154.
Search via ReFindit
Mačiulaitis, V. (2013). Termination of Labour Relations on Employer’s Initiative Without any Fault on the Part of an Employee in the Aspect of Flexicurity. Dissertation. https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/15954?show=full
Search via ReFindit
Petraityte, I. (2013). The Personal Data Protection Principles. Summary of Doctoral Dissertation. https://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:2001950/datastreams/MAIN/content
Search via ReFindit
Recommendation CM/Rec(2015)5 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the processing of personal data in the context of employment, item 13.2, CE, https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805c3f7a
Search via ReFindit
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance), Article 9(2)(g), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0679
Search via ReFindit
Rucker, M. Eismann, T.T., Meinel, M., Sollner, A., & Voigt, K.I. (2022). Balancing privacy and communication in activity-based workspaces: a longitudinal study. Journal of Corporate Real Estate http://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-11-2021-0038
Search via ReFindit
Skendzic, A. et al. (2018). General Data Protection Regulation - Protection of Personal Data in an Organisation. 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MICROELECTRONICS (MIPRO), 1370-1375.
Search via ReFindit
Stanev, S. (2019). Monitoring of Employees’ Personal Communications at Work. Practice of the ECtHR. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 8(1) https://ejcls.adapt.it/index.php/ejcls_adapt/article/view/646
Search via ReFindit
Suder, S. (2021). Processing employees' personal data during the Covid-19 pandemic. European Labour Law Journal, 12(3), 322-337 . http://doi.org/10.1177/2031952520978994
Search via ReFindit
Svec, M., Horecky, J., & Madlenak, A (2018). GDPR in labour relations - with or without the consent of the employee? Ad Alta-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(2), 281-286.
Search via ReFindit
Syroid, T.L., Kaganoyska, T.Y., Shamraieya, V.M., Perederii, O.S., Titov, I.B., & Varunts, L.D. (2021). The Personal Data Protection Mechanism in the European Union. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(5), 113-120. http://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.5.17
Search via ReFindit
Tamasauskaite-Janicke, G. (2016). The usage of information and communication technologies at the workplace in the context of labour law, Summary of the Doctoral Dissertation Social Sciences, Law (01S) http://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:16976749/datastreams/MAIN/content
Search via ReFindit
Vermanen, M., Rantanen, M.M., & Koskinen, J. (2022). Privacy in Internet of Things Ecosystems - Prerequisite for the Ethical Data Collection and Use by Companies. Edited by: Kreps et al. HUMAN CHOICE AND DIGITAL BY DEFAULT: AUTONOMY VS DIGITAL DETERMINATION, HCC. Book Series IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 656, 18-26. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_2
Search via ReFindit
Vignesh, R. & Prasad, K.M. (2022). Blockchain-based security enhancement mechanism for employee performance assessment system. Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience, 34(27), Article Number 7318 http://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.7318
Search via ReFindit